Search for: "State Land Board v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Hough v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
Hough v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
Board of Education, and Roe v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
United States, upholding the internment of Japanese-Americans by a 6-3 decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:01 pm
And that value was as important for the Chinese, Russians, and second tier group of American-wary states, as it now appears to be to the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:21 am
United States During a teleconference briefing last week, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Southeast Asia Patrick Murphy announced that U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
Residents Against Specific Plan 380 v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 7:38 am
R.S. 31:122 [4] Ferrara v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:19 am
Although at the time the removal permit was sought only one of the six units was occupied, the Board denied the permit. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Lane; and (2) whether the United States Supreme Court has jurisdiction over a state court determination of retroactivity of a case on collateral review, when a state has both adopted and applied Teague. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
Instead, he argued, it should be treated like a residence located on land – which would be governed by state law instead of federal maritime law. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
But the state appeals court disagreed and ruled that the two parcels should be considered as one; if the parcels are viewed together, the siblings were not deprived of all of the value of their land – a requirement for a taking. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
From 2006 through 2018, plaintiffs honored the forbearance agreements while WOH “guided the project through . . . the APA permit, Town of Tupper Lake rezoning and subdivision approvals, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation permits, United States Army Corps of Engineers permits, and New York State Attorney General approvals” (Henry Aff., ¶ 5). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:09 pm
Any party challenging the project must concurrently file all its other claims regarding land use approvals. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:40 pm
United States, 322 U.S. 78 (1944). [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In Board of County Commissioners of Weld County v. [read post]
