Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 721 - 740
of 7,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2015, 10:55 am
On January 22, 2015, in the case of Barrows v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
Goldstein v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:34 am
Friday the ILB noted that the Supreme Court had failed to grant transfer in the case of Heidbreder, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 9:32 am
In PhoneDog v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Eugene V. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:43 pm
I thought that Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:42 am
Colorado is a death penalty state. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 6:31 am
The ongoing Utah case on patent infringement is Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:59 pm
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 3:45 am
Briefly: At USA Today, Richard Wolf predicts “a ferocious battle this year if a seat falls vacant” on the Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 6:44 am
The name of the case is Kirby v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:03 am
It seems more likely that Congress will ask states to disclose basic information about how the election system is run than to regulate state election systems top-down. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:23 am
Trinity Lutheran of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:38 am
The case, Lebron v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 1:41 pm
” Although other states including Texas and Oklahoma, have attempted to pass similar laws, the potential legal battles have left them with little success. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm
But Feldman does not try to make too much of the contemporary relevance of the battles he describes: this is a first-rate work of narrative history that succeeds in bringing the intellectual and political battles of the post-Roosevelt Court vividly to life. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:36 pm
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
