Search for: "US DEPT JUSTICE"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,673
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 10:16 am
Texas Dept. of Housing v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:24 pm
Chief Justice John G. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 3:22 am
The court’s decision, by Nassau County Commercial Division Justice Stephen A. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:33 am
We have this landmark to guide us. [read post]
U.S. Dept. of Justice finds Google's Supreme Court petition in Oracle case flawed, recommends denial
26 May 2015, 11:41 pm
Interoperability is generally relevant to fair use. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:12 pm
Yes, because, according to the Dept. of Justice, everyone’s records are relevant to terrorism investigationsNo, because the records the government demands must pertain to foreign powers or agents of foreign powers, not everyone A few hours’ sunset may not make much difference to beltway insiders, but a post-sunset vote re-instating Sec. 215 can correctly be seen by voters as a huge expansion in government surveillance power after that power had gone dormant. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
He did not explain why he did not ask his parents to loan him this same amount Page 18 to be better used perhaps for A.L.'s tuition. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:50 am
"At Supreme Court, Holder's Justice Dept. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Corp. v State of New York, 14 AD3d 817,818 [3d Dept 2005]). [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm
He did not explain why he did not ask his parents to loan him this same amount Page 18 to be better used perhaps for A.L.'s tuition. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
As such, this is an impermissible use of the subpoena process. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:23 am
The defendant’s motion for summary dismissal was granted by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice O. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
As such, this is an impermissible use of the subpoena process. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 1:57 pm
State Dept. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
" 554 US at 581. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
Dold v Martin, 284 App Div 127 [4th Dept 1954]). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
As for the phrase "bear arms," the Court adopted Justice Ginsburg's definition in Muscarello v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Analysis In Heller, the Supreme Court struck down District of Columbia statutes prohibiting the possession of handguns in the home and requiring lawfully-owned firearms to be kept inoperable. (554 US at 635.) [read post]
