Search for: "US v. Boss" Results 721 - 740 of 1,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Florian Mueller
"Another way SEP holders earn revenue from their inventions is by licensing them for use in others' products (e.g., licensing Qualcomm's SEPs for use in a handset with an Intel chip). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Roberts Jr. and his former boss and mentor, Justice Anthony M. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
: IPO announces public consultation on trade mark fees (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Out-Law) (IPKat) US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Patent Reform Act 2009 (Inventive Step) (Patent Prospector) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Law360) (Hal Wegner)   Global Global - General The global economic crisis and the intellectual property ecosystem IP Think Tank podcast 6 March 2009 (IP Think Tank)… [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Marie Louise
YouTube (TorrentFreak) US Copyright Group – Evidence against BitTorrent users slammed in court: Dmitriy Shirokov v US Copyright Group (TorrentFreak) [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
New ruling says bosses can monitor private communications – or does it? [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:55 am
We have a request in to our boss for information/documentation from the architectural firm that got us certified (M&V plan, etc.). [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am by Andrew Hamm
As Justice Antonin Scalia – Kagan’s former colleague and Clement’s former boss – famously said to those who disagreed with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm by Shea Denning
  (One post used her initials and another used a shortened version of her name.) [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
UCBR Police Officer’s Facebook Post Criticizing Her Boss Isn’t Protected Speech–Graziosi v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:55 pm
It's packed with news and analysis of recent big cases -- including the Dyson v Vax dispute mentioned above and Schlumberger v EMGS, noted by the IPKat here. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
The dispute in Eureka E.C Oxenham & Cy Ltd V Oxenham A E & Anor (2020 SCJ 92) centred on whether the respondent could use his name and signature “Alexander Oxenham” and “A. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 4:41 am by Susan Brenner
 They formed a team against Christopher’s “boss and the boss's son. [read post]