Search for: "United States v. Clinton"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2008, 1:06 am
United States Subscription Required [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
That panel will be held on 7 March, at the 19th session of the Council, and it will be chaired by South Africa.So the campaign for LGBT human rights is not just about the United States lecturing other nations (and in fact, Hillary Clinton’s speech struck a note of mutual collaboration and respect). [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 4:04 am
Evil laugh> from Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, Ross Perot, IBM, NASA and the Rockefellers, among others in Tyler v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
Given how important our vote is for the most important office in the world, these communications raise huge issues and questions of what is allowed under the law.In 2010 the Supreme Court of the United States made a ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
At the time of the impeachment proceedings involving Clinton, the standard view among academics, although not the House of Representatives, was that Clinton’s conduct was not an “offense against the United States” because it did not involve his actions as president. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Belmont (1937), United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
In the United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 7:46 am
Horton petitioned for review of this ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which overturned the Board in 2013. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Most tellingly, it would reverse Buckley v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm
Chief Judge Gregory, who wrote the majority opinion, was originally nominated by President Bill Clinton. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
President Clinton proudly signed it. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
” Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm
(p. 29) In contrast, the ban only applies to foreign nationals who are seeking to enter the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:34 am
And in Davis v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
Clinton should have more respect for the independence and dignity of the judiciary as a co-equal but non-political branch of government. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm
In Nesbitt v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:42 pm
She sounds like a super-perky high school president, not a United States Senator. [read post]
