Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 9:26 am
The case, FTC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:09 pm
Judge Jackson rejected Craig’s defense that pursuant to jurisprudence in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:09 pm
Judge Jackson rejected Craig’s defense that pursuant to jurisprudence in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 12:33 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Paul A. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
Here are excerpts:For two decades, the United States has pursued, prosecuted and sentenced cocaine offenders in a way that borders on insanity -- targeting petty criminals over serious drug dealers -- while fostering contempt, instead of respect, for the policies that have sent tens of thousands to jail. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
Law Lessons from PAUL MORGAN v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:40 pm
Let’s hope he is just as correct and that Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 1:50 pm
Following an eight-day benchtrial, the United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Texas denied both parties’ claims. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:04 am
United States, No. 17-8830. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 2:44 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:55 am
United States, which is scheduled for argument next week (subscription required). [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 4:05 pm
United States, see here. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
In one the defect alleged involves mold, in the other the control unit. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Once again, our old friend and colleague Paul Schwind is following an interesting ongoing case. [read post]
