Search for: "B. R." Results 7381 - 7400 of 55,772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
Just a quick note on an interesting point that came up for decision in Plant, R (on the application of) v Lambeth London Borough Council [2016] EWHC 3324 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Lambeth’s decision (after a ‘reconsultation’ after Lambeth lost a first judicial review) to proceed with the demolition and redevelopment of the Cressingham Gardens estate. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:32 pm by Giles Peaker
R (OAO Harris) v London Borough of Islington. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 1:55 pm by Giles Peaker
Section 7 provides: 7. (1) The decision-making officer must produce a written record of any decision which falls within paragraph (2). (2) A decision falls within this paragraph if it would otherwise have been taken by the relevant local government body, or a committee, sub-committee of that body or a joint committee in which that body participates, but it has been delegated to an officer of that body either— (a) under a specific express authorisation; or (b) under a general… [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:12 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
§ 1321(b)(7), should familiarize themselves with the eight factors a court will consider when deciding what penalty should be assessed. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 2:00 am by Amy Pierce
  In its Electrical Currents newsletter, Volume 19, No. 8 (August 2015), it confirms that the term “associated” means “only the cable originally connected to the united listed on the Class B label may be extended or replaced to accommodate the replacement unit. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:18 am by Matt Osenga
Lamar Smith (R-TX) introduced a Manager’s Amendment to H.R. 1249. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Mannion recently allowed a punitive damages claim to survive a Fed.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss in a trucking accident litigation with allegations of sleep deprivation in the case of Coello v. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 10:31 am
At the detention hearing, the judge determines according to statute whether any "condition or combination of conditions set forth in subsection (c) of this section will reasonably assure the appearance of such person as required and the safety of any other person and the community." 18 USC 3142(b). [read post]