Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 13,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 6:01 am
"The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s decision, explaining that "[I]n a proceeding seeking judicial review of administrative action, the court may not substitute its judgment for that of the agency responsible for making the determination, but must ascertain only whether there is a rational basis for the decision or whether it is arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
That was the first of more than 500 visits S.T. made to healthcare providers to address a constellation of conditions related to her claim that she suffered a traumatic brain injury.One year after the accident, the Social Security Administration declared S.T. permanently disabled and awarded her permanent disability benefits. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 5:03 am
In the relatively recent California state court decision of Walsh v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm
Accord Sammons v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
The court looked to guidance of the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) and a vintage House of Lords ruling, Scandecor Development AB v Scandecor Marketing AB [2001] UKHL 21 [says the IPKat, Scandecor is one of the most perplexing cases on the planet. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
Here in North Carolina, the Administrative Office of the Courts provides some general guidance for jurors: “You should dress comfortably, but not too casually. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:09 am
In The Desa Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:55 am
As one pundit noted:The Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 1:44 pm
" We're still very excited about the ability to send our officers into strip clubs on the clock, even after the permit's been revoked.)But, in the end, the Court of Appeal affirms. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am
There follows a succinct account of Strasbourg jurisprudence on this point, from registration of a doctor Konig v Germany (No1) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 (civil right) to liability to tax (not a civil right) (Ferrazini v Italy (44759/98) (2001) STC 1314), via the all important decision in Pellegrin v France (2001) 31 EHRR 26 ECHR not to allow administrative servants the guarantees of Article 6 because their employment involves important… [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 5:15 pm
Supreme Court held, in 1966’s Schmerber v. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 5:55 am
From Raila v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 11:00 pm
” The question before the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Administrative Law Matters 3. [read post]
Consumer Watchdog v. WARF: Consumer Rights Organization Lacks Standing to Appeal Inter Partes Reexam
4 Jun 2014, 8:10 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am
Clark that concerned Crown liability, the Supreme Court found that police cannot sue Crown attorneys for misfeasance of public office, i.e., for the misuse or abuse of power in public office. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:40 am
In JSC Lake Highlands Operations, LP v. [read post]
