Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm
Its daily average figure also rose by 21.4 per cent to 4,365,716. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am
(Michael Geist) ACTRA Rep says mashups “morally wrong” (Michael Geist) Europe European Commission investigates Samsung over possible abuse of FRAND patents against Apple (FOSS Patents) Busted pirate movie site, Kino.to, primed for grand 1.5 million euro rebirth (TorrentFreak) General Court upholds likelihood of confusion between figurative trade mark SEE MORE and earlier Danish and Finish word marks C-MORE for ‘ the computer accessories, in particular for… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 7:04 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Below is my column in the Hill on the trial of Depp v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Justice Joseph Quinn's November 29, 2010 ruling in Bruni v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
IDT Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
Leading extremist CD was alleged the be the leading figure in a close group of Islamic extremists based in north London who were planning terrorist attacks, probably involving firearms. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:21 am
Healthpoint, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
He observes that the Lord Advocate has provided figures on the substantial price rises which would be needed, if a tax was selected, rather than minimum unit pricing, to achieve the same floor price. 1443: Mr O’Neill QC renews his submissions that the economic effects of increased tax on moderate drinkers are not relevant; and he says that this disbenefit has never been proven in any effect. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
Delashaw Jr., the former head of the Swedish Neuroscience Institute who was a central figure in an investigative series that found aggressive business practices and a toxic work environment at the clinic were jeopardizing patient care. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
For defendants will be able to rely on it where those they have criticised are neither public officials nor public figures (to whom the Supreme Court extended the “actual malice” rule in Curtis Publishing Co v Butts 388 U.S. 130 (1967)) (at [106]). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Murphy v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am
After DeCanas v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:33 am
Sellify Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:59 am
Cornelius v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:49 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 10:58 am
.)'s opinion in Houser v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 2:47 pm
From Peterson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 2:05 pm
So here I was watching Saturday Night Live (Google v. iPhone) when I noticed this post on the MarinadeDave blog: ALERT! [read post]
