Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 7381 - 7400
of 7,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2007, 5:30 am
Today, Engel v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Cystic Fibrosis Chapter 6917 Arlington Road, Suite 308 Bethesda, MD 20814 Phone: (301) 657-8444; (877) 657-8444 (Toll Free) Fax: (301) 652-9571 E-mail: metro-dc@cff.org Web: http://www.cff.orgmetrodc.htm Developmental Disabilities State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council MD Developmental Disabilities Council 300 West Lexington Street, Box 10 Baltimore, MD 21201-2323 Phone: (410) 333-3688 (V/TTY); (800) 305-6441 (Toll Free in MD only) E-mail: info@md-council.org Web:… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 1:35 am
While the letter is the second by the House Republican leaders asking the Governor to join Kentucky as they appeal the case of Baze v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:38 am
While the letter is the second by the House Republican leaders asking the Governor to join Kentucky as they appeal the case of Baze v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:50 pm
Maryland or Brown v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:17 am
One recent example is Romer v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
One recent example is Romer v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
Drukteinis (M.D. and J.D.) discussed the legal issues presented when a consultant refuses the request of the ER doc, at NY Emergency Medicine;Tort "reform" took center state at a Republican presidential debate. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:50 pm
Carl Keys has a round-up of the news from New York at Capital Defense Weekly. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
While this may seem unjust, courts have also upheld the franchise tag as a valid practice. [25] Linebacker Wilbur Marshall challenged the validity by filing memorandum in federal court, where the designation was deemed fair and reasonable - the court stated that market conditions still favored players. [26] Seeing that the franchise tag is a valid practice, the players will have to seek a forum other than the courts to address their issue with the designation.… [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
Welcome to Blawg Review #130 -- the Northern Hemisphere edition! [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:36 am
(Decision, Launders v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:36 am
(Decision, Launders v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 7:47 pm
Using Zedner v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 12:01 pm
Doe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:58 am
Doe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 5:05 pm
This case cannot square with the strict requirements of New Jersey v. [read post]
