Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 7381 - 7400 of 7,413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Victor
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm by support
’s small claims court, the automaker has been hit with a class-action lawsuit out of the Golden State. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:56 am by Steve Lombardi
You have no clients, have never tried a case, haven’t ever interviewed a client, have no money that the government’s student loan program didn’t put in your bank account; you can hardly afford to live and are wondering when you’ll get your first paid vacation because law school and the bar exam have exhausted you physically, mentally and spiritually. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Implemented in 1991, Sweden’s carbon tax was one of the first in the world, second only to Finland’s carbon tax, which was implemented a year earlier. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:14 pm by Orin S. Kerr
[An important case on "The Digital Fourth Amendment"] Regular readers may recall my prior coverage of United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by John Gregory
In general, that means the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), which has led the development of e-commerce law in the world. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
The tax treatment of dual-income earners in a family comes from social and legal assumptions the tax code makes when evaluating the nature of taxable units. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
With more than $25 trillion of gross assets under management, private funds now have surpassed the size of our entire $23 trillion commercial banking system.[16] Private fund investors often are retirement funds and endowments. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Gregory
United States The Uniform Law Commission has just launched a Drafting Committee on Electronic Wills. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:55 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The fiscal responses to the COVID-19 pandemic will require policymakers to consider what revenue resources should be used to fill budget gaps. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
I find the start of each academic year invariably invigorating. [read post]
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of a lessee’s ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS… [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(Please note that these figures reflect only federal court securities class action lawsuit filings; the filing numbers do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings during the year.) [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am by Tess Graham
Under Secretary of State Nuland on Accelerating Aid to Ukraine and Sanctions Against Russiaby Viola Gienger (@ViolaGienger) (March 9, 2022) Humanitarian Corridors in Ukraine: Impasse, Ploy or Narrow Passage of Hope? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
The fourth quarter of 2011 also saw some very large leveraged buyout transactions in the United States which bodes well for the higher end of the market in Canada, which transactions we have not seen domestically for several years. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]