Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 7401 - 7420 of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 8:01 am by Margaret Sachs
    The Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:39 am by John Hochfelder
The appeals court did not disturb the $400,000 damages verdict so on retrial that figure will apply to the new liability verdict. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
’”) Howard claims that Black “stands with figures like John Marshall, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, and William Brennan who have genuinely shaped the Court’s jurisprudence. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 1:50 pm by Jim Gerl
And, you know, because again we could be spending a lot of our time litigating something that we probably could not even figure out. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:40 am by Larry Downes
”) Meanwhile, the parties all sue each other, and after years of poring over each other’s documents during discovery, figure out, more-or-less, who’s really invented what. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 5:40 am by Jacob Wirz
But in the part of its opinion devoted to the major questions doctrine, the Court did not just cite this large dollar figure and call it a day. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And these are just the possibly sympathetic figures: For others, see the Bible's account of Judas, or any book noting the deaths of Hitler, Himmler, Goe­r­ing, or Goebbels. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
But it's confusing, because it discusses a statute; then you read the statute and figure out that you can amend after the drop dead date, but it won't scrape off that debt! [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]