Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 7401 - 7420 of 12,219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
People v Kelly Court Discusses a Defendant’s Confrontation Rights Regarding Breathalyzer Machines The Defendant was arrested of driving under the influence after the arresting officer observed his erratic behavior including swerving and nearly striking the traffic delineators. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
’ It appears that the corporate parent of the Times–Picayune also took the Slabbed.org blog offline after Perret and Leary demanded this retraction. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am by John Day
”  Perhaps these examples can be dismissed as an effort by the courts not to elevate form over substance when dealing with the rights of people who are guilty of crimes. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 Just watch out when one of us starts blogging about dead people. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
The town then took the case on to the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
The Supreme Court has noticed the issue as well: At the Supreme Court, SYG dates back to the 1895 case of Beard v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
” His adversary, Professor Herbert Hart, took much the same position as Mill. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 10:45 am by David Bernstein
One labor agent, known as Peg-Leg Williams, claimed to have moved eighty thousand people by 1900. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
When the money people challenged these restrictions under the First Amendment (on the theory that campaign contributions and spending constitutes political speech), the Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:15 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That bad, judge-created exception to the Fourth Amendment from the 1970s (Smith v. [read post]