Search for: "United States v. Lively" Results 7401 - 7420 of 11,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
In a statement he read in court, Jokić stated he had a moral and personal obligation to accept responsibility and to ask forgiveness for the acts of his subordinates: "The fact that these lives were lost in the area for which I was responsible will remain etched in my consciousness for the rest of my life. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:05 pm by Amanda Frost
  The seventeen Justices who served on the Warren Court hailed from thirteen different states from across the United States, and regional diversity was once a factor in the nomination process. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 8:23 pm
On the other side of the fence, In Kitzmiller v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
Circuit, city officials said their appeal to the Supreme Court would present some variation of these questions: "(1) whether the panel majority's decision conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am by Melina Padron
W -v- M and S and A NHS Primary Care Trust [COP 1182483] Court of protection: Not in woman in vegetative state’s best interests to remove artificial nutrition and hydration. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:28 am
The Court noted the importance of the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:59 am by Susan Brenner
[and] indicated [he] . . . lived in Chile and used zip code `ucc16. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 7:24 pm
And will you move back to the United States for an Obama administration? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
Washington Post Article Wall Street Journal Article The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:00 pm
Now, we all remember this popular number from law school -- United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 11:17 am by Christopher Ernst
Last month, a United States District Court in Nevada threw out an investor’s appeal of a FINRA arbitration award, upholding the notion that the FINRA panel acted with the utmost integrity as is par for the course with that organization.In the case, Sanduski v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:11 am by David Orentlicher
In particular, the constitutional challenge ultimately rests on a flawed premise—that if Congress can require people to buy a good or service solely because they are living in the United States, the commerce clause will be converted into an expansive power to compel just about any purchase. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
Right Side News As discussed in Fallout from the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Pt 1, the United States federal government is taking a more and more integral role in the distribution and transmission of electricity and in the energy sector throughout the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 9:52 am
Randazza also represented Above the Law when we were recently sued, in the short-lived lawsuit of Jones v. [read post]