Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 7421 - 7440 of 19,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On Monday, October 24, the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) confirmed that it did not appeal the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Trafigura Trading LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
 Under the Court’s rules, the Justices will take on a case that is still pending undecided in an appeals court only if it raises an issue of “such imperative importance” as to justify bypassing the usual route up to the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am by Jessica Smith
Even if an out-of-court statement doesn’t fall within a specific hearsay exception, it still may be admissible under the residual exceptions to the hearsay rule. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
Abortion will still be in demand, because hearts haven’t yet been changed. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:30 am by Dr Rose Hughes
Even if the Court of Appeal is not bound by retained EU case law, it may still decide not to depart from it.What were the Court’s options here? [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
  Yep, there's an unoccupied car, its engine still running. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:46 pm
The trial court permitted these photos because they were “relevant to his intent in the stalking charge. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 3:31 pm
  (The opinion here says "yes" but concedes that the Court of Appeal is divided on that point.) [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 10:52 am by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General had advised the Justices to review. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:10 pm
But it is sadder still when the dispute is about which child will look after their ailing parent. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:27 am by Tuan Samahon
Documentary evidence has long been available that Fortas collaborated with the FBI to influence the Supreme Court’s resolution of Black v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 12:20 pm
So, with a reminder of the test, Justice Kennedy went on to slap the wrists of the Court of Appeals:"This Court has "more than once cautioned that courts 'should not read into the patent laws limitations and conditions which the legislature has not expressed.'" (Diamond v Diehr (1981). [read post]