Search for: "OR Specific, Inc." Results 7441 - 7460 of 37,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2020, 10:04 am by Ian Patterson
GAO’s decision in Kord Technologies, Inc., B-417748.5 (Comp. [read post]
20 May 2020, 3:00 am by William W. Abbott and Glen C. Hansen
A court may identify specific hours that should be eliminated or simply reduce the award to account for the limited success of a claimant. [read post]
Other technology vendors, like Drishti Technologies Inc., integrate worker proximity monitoring into safety and assembly monitoring solutions. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
There is thus nothing civil-specific or anti-discrimination-law specific about the ministerial exception in all its grandeur. [read post]
19 May 2020, 12:34 pm by Jonathan Assia and Maxine Neuhauser
The two sued Tri-Modal Distribution Services and the two staffing agencies, Scotts Labor Leasing Company, Inc., and Pacific Leasing, Inc., that were their technical employers, claiming that they were denied promotions on account of their race. [read post]
19 May 2020, 8:18 am by Charles Sartain
Pathfinder Oil & Gas, Inc. we learn that if you want one agreement to be conditioned on execution of another one, you’d better say so … in writing … in the first one. [read post]
19 May 2020, 5:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, the plaintiffs’ remaining causes of action are duplicative of the legal malpractice cause of action, since they arise from the same facts as those underlying the legal malpractice cause of action and do not allege distinct damages; hence, they are similarly subject to dismissal (see Mackey Reed Elec., Inc. v Morrone & Assoc., P.C., 125 AD3d 822, 823; Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813). [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm by scottgaille
If the terms “disease,” “epidemic,” or “pandemic” are specifically enumerated, COVID-19 is likely a covered event. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The HH Defendants “may not shift to the client the legal responsibility [they were] specifically hired to undertake. [read post]