Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7441 - 7460
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2024, 5:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
In his Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 9:45 am
Several nongovernmental organizations challenged the constitutionality of the regulations in the Israeli High Court of Justice, which issued an interim order in Ben Meir v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:38 am
The Midwestern agricultural states were hit particularly hard. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
On February 20, 2024, the New York Court of Appeals handed down its opinion in Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
Hungar, it seems to me that RCA would matter, even under your view of the world, because if you think that Congress did not codify the existing state of the law as to the standard of proof and you think that section 282 was essentially silent as to the standard of proof, then the question is, what do we do? [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
As a patent holder, you should know you're hurting when one of skill in the art for your invention has "at least a high school diploma. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Second, in Oncale v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
In today’s case (Snow v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:31 am
In Zhang v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm
Less willing to accept claims from copyright holders to have “occupied the field”—Bill Graham and the recent A.V. v. iParadigms (anti-plagiarism software). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
Granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 7:05 am
Interestingly, as part of the overview of stablecoins, the Report highlights in a footnote that stablecoins should be eligible for deposit insurance at the holder level if the stablecoin issuer deposits fiat currency reserves at an FDIC-insured bank and in a manner that meets statutory requirements for “pass-through” deposit insurance coverage. [read post]
