Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 7441 - 7460 of 19,616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
The state opposed Supreme Court review, but the Justices granted the case on June 24. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Historians appear prominently in the Supreme Court's decision in Haaland v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
"However, in the name of Jesus, there is still hope for the hopeless, for some who have been down so long they can't even think on how to get up," Gundy said. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm by Bob Corn-Revere
The Court likewise applied strict scrutiny in Burson v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:08 pm by George M. Wallace
. ~~~ Pleadings/Court Filings The Complaint in the case of Joseph Rakofsky, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” The court first found that Earth Justice had standing under DC law (the DC courts are not Article III federal courts). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They relied on the following statement by the Supreme Court in the 1928 case of Frost v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
" In support of this determination, Justice Dunne cited two cases: another case brought by Lilker, Lilker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:32 am
  Justice Stevens supported the above conclusion with a citation to Village of Euclid v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
  Writing for the Court and joined by Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Ginsburg, Justice Kennedy recognized that states have historically been allowed to define marriage--subject to Congressional restraints as in Loving v. [read post]
22 Jun 2006, 12:55 pm by Philip Mann
Today the Supreme Court decided NOT to hear the LabCorp v. [read post]
22 Jun 2006, 12:55 pm
Today the Supreme Court decided NOT to hear the LabCorp v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 1:14 pm by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
Today, the United States Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Hamilton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm by Barry Winograd
When the NLRA was enacted, the reach of the Commerce Clause was still confined under then-existing Supreme Court doctrine, changing in 1937 when the Court confirmed a more expansive view of the Commerce Clause in NLRB v. [read post]