Search for: "Young v. State" Results 7441 - 7460 of 8,894
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm by Erin Miller
United States (upholding a military curfew on Japanese-Americans living in certain “military areas” in California) and Korematsu v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:55 am by Steve Kalar
It does to Judge Kleinfeld (left) in a new categorical analysis decision, United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:01 am by Marc Poirier
In spring a young woman’s fancy turns to love. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:10 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
I have done several posts on this blog (here, here, here, here, here, and here) about the inaccuracy of regular and cross-racial eyewitness identifications and whether expert testimony about this inaccuracy should be allowed. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am by Rosalind English
Case comment by Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC and Justin Levinson (Barristers for the Claimant, MAGA) MAGA v The Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256, Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Lord Justice Longmore and Lady Justice Smith) (read judgment) This appeal was brought with permission from the trial Judge Mr Justice Jack. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm by Tom Goldstein
  That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:38 am by Steve Hall
(“Betsy”) Julian, ‘73, Inclusive Communities Project, on Young v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am by Giovanni Comandé
and Maria Gagliardi Italian report on Insurance law between business law and consumer law News/Annonces /NoticiasComparative Health Care Liability and Regulation:A Technology-Based Approach – International Summer School Pisa, Italy 24th – 4th June 2010New Frontiers of Pharmaceutical Law - Young Researchers WorkshopLecce, Italy, 6th and 7th of May 2010 "What Price for the Community Enforcement of WTO Dispute Settlement Body’s Rulings? [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]