Search for: "State v. Record" Results 7461 - 7480 of 43,404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
Records do acknowledge several arrests for possession, but in most of those instances the charges were dropped. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
If an attorney or law firm has procured clients through marketing efforts that run afoul of the barratry statute, it would be in its interest to have the issued resolved in a private forum, and not create a public record, but does that advance the state's public policy? [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' Criminal Justice Integrity Unit identified this issue in the early months after the law took effect.It makes no sense that these records would be secret at San Antonio PD and public if the same thing has happened to a Bexar County Sheriff's deputy, but that's how state law presently treats law enforcement disciplinary records. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
The Court noted that the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit considered the question in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:17 am by Editor
5th.circuit.png In bank and credit card fraud case, while hearsay and double hearsay issues were presented by the introduction of bank computerized printouts reflecting reports of cardholder telephone calls and the statements of cardholders concerning lost, stolen or not received cards, the statements and printouts were admissible under residual hearsay exception based on “equivalent circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness”, in United States v. [read post]