Search for: "United States v. Grant" Results 7461 - 7480 of 25,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2022, 11:57 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Federal courts in Florida allow a part to obtain a temporary restraining order, commonly referred to as a “TRO,” by proving the following elements set forth by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Schiavo ex. rel Schindler v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:05 pm by James Nicholas
On June 16, 2017, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) changed its position with respect to the enforceability of class action waivers in the labor and employment context. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 12:25 am
Compare 478 F.3d 658 (case below), and Roberson, 459 F.3d 39 ( § 802(44) provides exclusive definition of "felony drug offense"), with United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm
When Gillet discovered that plaintiffs were selling similar pliers in the United States, the company sued them for patent infringement. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:52 am by Anna Christensen
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:07 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] that police must generally obtain a warrant in order to obtain cell phone location data. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 12:29 pm
United States (1968) 391 U.S. 123, 128-136 (Bruton).) [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 10:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
In 2010, the United States General Services Administration (“the GSA”) solicited bids for office space to house the Cincinnati office of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 11:49 am by Erin Napoleon
In United States Patent and Trademark Office v Booking.com BV, the court upheld a Fourth Circuit decision stating that simply adding a top-level domain to a generic term does not render the mark generic in its entirety. [read post]