Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 7481 - 7500 of 11,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
How that scrutiny should be applied is a matter left to other articles. [1].Riley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:26 am by Guest Blogger
For some, that means terminations needed to save a woman’s life are not abortions—and for others that means pregnancy should never be terminated, no matter the consequence. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Florida Court of Appeals that involves domestic violence and “cyberstalking. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
In any event, my point for now is that the majority opinion proceeded more or less in the same way that sports fans evaluate claims that some rule change fundamentally alters the nature of a game.Dissenting for himself and Justice Thomas in PGA Tour, Justice Scalia questioned the whole enterprise:Nowhere is it writ that PGA TOUR golf must be classic “essential” golf. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm by Matthias Weller
Litigants”, New York University Law Review 94 (2019), pp 1210-1243 Cong, Junqi “Reinventing China’s Indirect Jurisdiction over Civil and Commercial Matters con [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Then, based on the election results, the slate of electors associated with the winning campaign is the one that is selected as a matter of state law. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:03 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In determining, as an analytic and doctrinal matter, whether there was a disparate impact, the circuit majority concluded, what matters is how successful Asian-American applicants as a group were under the new policy in comparison to how members of other racial groups did—not how Asian-American applicants had done, relatively speaking, under the prior admissions policy. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
" Chief Justice Rehnquist appeared twice before House committees on similarly mundane matters. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Thierer
Understanding the Origins of Political Struggles In his many enlightening books, Thomas Sowell, a great economist and an even better political scientist, often warns of the triumph of good intentions over good economics. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
After Thomas Black was convicted of possessing “at least four grams of methamphetamine but less than 200 grams, with the intent to deliver”, he appealed. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
[So holds an Eleventh Circuit panel; Judge Andrew Brasher's concurring opinion that notes the potential First Amendment problems with imposing liability for such speech.] [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:14 am by Matthias Weller
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 3:58 am by Matthias Weller
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:22 am by Matthias Weller
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:20 am by Ronald Mann
Ordinarily, however bizarre the ruling, that would be the end of the matter, because decisions to remand cases to state court are not appealable. [read post]