Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 7481 - 7500 of 39,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
`In other words, while DoD personnel may participate in civilian law enforcement activities in their private capacities, they may not do so under the auspices of the military. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:23 am
City of New York BRONX COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Granted Motion to Reargue; Court Adheres to Prior Decision Denying Vacatur People v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:09 am
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeCourt Finds Defendant's Love Letters Not Intended To Harass; Harassment Charges Is Dismissed People v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:07 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTCriminal PracticeEvidence Supported Terroristic Threat Conviction For Threats to County Social Services Caseworkers People, respondent v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 1:19 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeDefendant Granted Retrial on Newly Discovered Proof From Former Mob Informants' Testimony People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
But the Court itself issued no ruling.More than a century later, the Court entered the fray in Bush v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
If the tax is not assessable in India, there is no question of TDS being deducted by an assessee;(v) The general principle of fiscal legislation is that given a sufficient territorial connection or nexus between the person sought to be charged and the country seeking to tax him, income tax may extend to that person. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm by Amy Howe
  He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:33 am by Sophia Cope
Touset that border agents may forensically search, without any suspicion of wrongdoing, travelers’ electronic devices. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm by Jon Sands
While a district court has discretion to decline a deliberate-indifference instruction if the jury may become confused or the only defense is lack of identity, see United States v. [read post]