Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7481 - 7500
of 8,253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
With the passage of the “False Claims Amendments of 1986,” [5] the Attorney General of the United States was given the authority to issue Civil Investigative Demands in connection with the investigation of civil False Claims Act matters. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am
In that case, the court had ruled that Cablevision’s Remote Storage Digital Video Recorder (RS-DVR) did not infringe copyright holders’ reproduction and public performance rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:58 am
School of Law, Working Paper No. 34, 2012). [3] DeFazio Press Release. [4] Highmark, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 9:35 pm
Supreme Court this term, Gundy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:57 am
The degree to which Facebook respects or flaunts its own stated policies potentially impacts, not only the hundreds of millions of account holders Facebook states publicly that it has, but also the wider society. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:31 am
Previously, in the much criticized case C-539/03 – Roche Nederland v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:02 am
See Nabil v State Farm Mut Auto, 877 S.W.2d 177 (Mo Ct App 1994) stating: “This principal has been applied, absent ambiguity under the terms of an insurance contract, to find uninsured motorist coverage and to stack uninsured motorist coverage for the direct benefit of policy holders and their minor children based upon the public policy of Missouri, requiring uninsured motorist coverage, as expressed in section 379.203, RSMo 1986”… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
That's certainly true at the Supreme Court.The case is United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:11 am
The court’s decision in Unicolors, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:46 am
” In Macy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 11:46 am
In last year’s much publicized Macy v Holder decision, the EEOC — following earlier court precedents which held that Title VII’s prohibition against discrimination based on “sex” extends to claims for sex stereotyping, as well any other claim asserting that gender was taken into account — ruled that transgender workers are protected under Title VII. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:18 pm
Well, let's examine a case that will serve as a good illustration of these two charges: People v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:03 am
On October 8, 2010, the Court of Chancery of Delaware issued an important opinion, Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
How do HOAs secure the mortgage holder’s loan? [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:04 am
Trump-v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Again, the possession of the credit or debit card is enough warrant the felony enhancement in New York State. [read post]
