Search for: "Does 1 to 10" Results 7501 - 7520 of 42,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2011, 8:27 pm
" The method claim 1, to which claim 10 referred, was not rejected under § 101 or § 112 First. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:53 am
As to Panini's evidence, its long use of LIMITED (since 1994) does not necessarily establish acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am by David
 The second in a series, it follows this one: http://www.popehat.com/2011/10/05/shell-sing-for-you-part-1/. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:34 am
Here are the Orders, which are effective January 1, 2009*: (1) Order Amending Rules of Appellate Procedure (9, 15, 53, and sample form 15-1); and (2) Order Amending Administrative Rules (9 and 10), See, for instance, the new Adm. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am by MBettman
In a 6-1 decision the Court held that a gubernatorial pardon does not automatically entitle the recipient to have the record of the pardoned conviction sealed. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[1] A decision to allow MD&A line-item omissions to serve as a basis for Section 10(b) liability could have a significant impact on private securities fraud litigation. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, the ground of lack of novelty does not constitute a fresh ground of opposition within the meaning of opinion G 10/91.[1.1.4] Decision T 520/01, which was cited by the [patent proprietor], concerns a case that differs from the present case. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Today we consider T 21/81 of September 10, 1982.The applicant appealed against the refusal of its application by the Examining Division. [read post]