Search for: "New v. New"
Results 7501 - 7520
of 166,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2021, 1:15 pm
From the Supreme Court’s decision in Google v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
New Hampshire Right to Life v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 4:38 am
The IPKat team [including Merpel, of course] send their hearty congratulations to two newly-minted QCs with appropriately silky IP skills:Andrew Norris (Hogarth Chambers), a trade marks specialist who was involved in (among others) the Jack Wills v House of Fraser and Fenty v Topshop cases; andJames Segan (Blackstone Chambers), whose admirably broad practice takes in (among other things) IP and media matters, including the recent Conversant v Huawei and… [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:12 am
A. et al. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:12 pm
A case that was recently decided by the Appellate Division in New Jersey, State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:28 pm
New York City’s Department of Investigation may subpoena a “private citizen” in connection with its criminal investigations Virginia Parkhouse v Stringer, 55 AD3d 1 In New York City v Uniformed Fire Officers Asso., 95 NY2d 273, the Court of Appeals held that although an investigatory body such as New York City’s Department of Investigations [DOI] uses a procedure that the employee organization contended violates the provisions… [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:30 am
The post New in Newsweek: The Roberts Court is Poised To Unravel <i>Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
In Robinson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
In McElmurry v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 9:08 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm
A recent New York Appellate Division, First Department case—Marte v Tishman Constr. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Sarah Swan (JSD Candidate, Columbia) has posted to SSRN her article, A New Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Gender and Erotic Triangles in Lumley v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:49 pm
What are your NEW structured settlement best business options and practices following Spencer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Miller v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 6:00 am
In EagleView Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 3:12 pm
Adam Liptak has an interesting piece in this morning's New York Times about the precedential significance of Bush v Gore (issued 8 years ago this month). [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 9:21 pm
In Panetti v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 9:18 am
I requested that each of the parties in the election contest, Cooper v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 7:37 am
Over a decade ago, in Viscik v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:46 am
The USPTO has announced new procedures patent holders can follow to obtain additional Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) under the Federal Circuit’s January 2019 decision in Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
