Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 7501 - 7520 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Prather, 69 M.J. 338 (C.A.A.F. 2011) and United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Indeed, the interviews of Goldman Sachs employees were conducted jointly by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and the SEC. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  We’re not aware of this yet being done yet in the United States - by all means tell us if we're wrong - but a litigation hold order precluding plaintiff from deleting social media information was recently issued in Canada. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:00 am by Greg Mersol
  SCI removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois under CAFA, alleging that the amount in controversy exceeded $5 million as required by 28 U.S.C. section 1332(d)(2). [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
Altman's vulnerable medical state and age meant that her chances for reemployment into a comparable position were very low, and justified an extended period of notice. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am by WSLL
Appellant argues that collection of a sales tax on these vehicle transactions also violates the Commerce Clause, Art. 1, § 8, of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:00 am by Sally Katzen
United States on the fact that the activities at issue in those cases were ones in which the executive had traditionally engaged. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:05 am by gmlevine
” There is no constraint on a foreign holder of a U.S. trademark to maintain an ACPA action against a domestic infringer or for that matter against a foreign infringer in an in rem action if the registry or registrar is resident in the United States. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:51 pm by Thomas McDow
Lawyers have traditionally represented indigent criminal defendants pro bono but much of that duty has been absorbed by The State in the aftermath of Gideon v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Here is Kim’s guest post:    This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]