Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 13,890
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Today's appeal, in Case T-50/09 Ifemy’s Holding GmbH v OHIM, Dada & Co. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
District Court in Connecticut (Pedersen, et al., v Office of Personnel Management, docket 10-1750). [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:43 am
Allen v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Doe 1 v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm
The Court of Appeals reversed, relying on Motor Vehicle Admin. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:36 am
Herring v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:00 am
As Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote for the court in Dickerson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:48 pm
ON RED LIGHT CAMERAS .......Today, in Courtroom 2-11, beginning at 10:30 AM, Associate Administrative Judge Steve Leifman will begin a two day hearing, (currently scheduled to continue on Tuesday, June 16th at 10:00 AM), on the issue of Whether Red Light Camera tickets can be prosecuted in Miami-Dade County.In the case of City of Hollywood v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 8:13 am
Before posting this article, I called the PTO’s office of patent legal administration to ask if they were aware of the Berkheimer case and if they intended to update their guidance in light of its holding. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
See Prosecutor v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule V drugs are generally used for antidiarrheal, antitussive, and analgesic purposes. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule V drugs are generally used for antidiarrheal, antitussive, and analgesic purposes. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:25 am
That’s important since a recent Supreme Court ruling (U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:39 am
(Jenkins v Medical Laboratories of Eastern Iowa, Inc, July 20, 2012, Reade, L). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 11:20 am
Recently, in Moreno v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 3:42 am
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:43 pm
What to Do if You’ve Been Hurt at Work At the Law Offices of John C. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Despite Plaintiff's arguments to the contrary, the court explained that Plaintiff ignored the fact that he, not the Retirement System, bore the burden of proof at the administrative hearing. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Despite Plaintiff's arguments to the contrary, the court explained that Plaintiff ignored the fact that he, not the Retirement System, bore the burden of proof at the administrative hearing. [read post]
