Search for: "Ex Parte May" Results 7521 - 7540 of 12,870
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2013, 4:37 pm
I note that someone else may be adding her own entries in between. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
Therefore, 'there can be no question of an abuse of rights on the part of the applicant for a declaration of invalidity'. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
This tenet of due process is the judicial counterpart to the Ex Post Facto Clause found in Article I of the U.S. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am by Gene Quinn
By allowing this defense, the statute itself acknowledges that there may be business method patents. [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:00 am by koherston
This conduct on the part of [Wife] was extreme and outrageous and merits punitive damages…. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:17 am by Peter Bert
The IBA Council, at its session of May 25, 2013, has approved the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation in International Arbitration. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:20 am by John Pfaff
As the markets have matured, much of the violence may have dissipated, but some of the public health concerns remain. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From Ex parte VAGHEFIOf written description and genus/species:In particular, Appellants contend that the written descriptionrequirement for a claimed genus may be satisfied through sufficientdescription of a representative number of species. [read post]
28 May 2013, 6:30 am by Gene Quinn
Kappos will discuss the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, specifically discussing ex parte reexamination, the remaining legacy inter partes reexamination cases, inter partes review and the transitional program relating to covered business method patents. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
  What I don’t get is why secret war defined by unilateral Article II lethal action, combined with criminal process, rendition, and related tactics, is preferable, or why the Article II approach is going to constrain this and future presidents more robustly than if Congress were involved in defining and reviewing presidential action, ex ante or ex post. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Whether the just-confirmed Circuit Court nominee, Sri Srinivasan, will take part in the case may be doubtful. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
This letter said, in part:1. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am by Giles Peaker
This letter said, in part:1. [read post]
27 May 2013, 4:18 am by Barry Sookman
The case involved an ex-employee of a company Vestergaard, a company in the business of selling insecticidal bednets. [read post]
26 May 2013, 4:00 am by Florian Mueller
These are the points from Judge Robart's ruling that Google likes (quoting from Google's representation of Judge Robart's ruling in its latest filing with the appeals court, not from the original decision):"ex ante incremental value at the time of standardization may be helpful in determining a FRAND rate but is only one factor in the analysis""Georgia-Pacific requires a hypothetical negotiation at the time of first infringement""only certain Georgia-Pacific factors may be… [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
However, part of Florida’s standard jury instruction 3.6(f), Justifiable Use of Deadly Force, instructs the jury that when they “consider the issue of self-defense, they may take into account the relative physical abilities and capacities of the defendant and the victim. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
However, part of Florida’s standard jury instruction 3.6(f), Justifiable Use of Deadly Force, instructs the jury that when they “consider the issue of self-defense, they may take into account the relative physical abilities and capacities of the defendant and the victim. [read post]