Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 7521 - 7540 of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Thus, in Cox v Turkey (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 DePuy’s Motions: Failure to Warn and Related ClaimsRelying on Oakberg v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Jeremy reflects again on the importance of this figure, hoping that the debate over its possible implementation and strengthen in the UK may be soon re-o [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:17 pm
The Court of Appeal in Sacramento County Employees' Retirement Association v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:46 am by jonathanturley
Here are the opinions: 20231114 Opin Ord – LaBrant et al v Benson 20231114 Opin Ord – Trump v Benson   [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:58 pm by Christopher Bird
The best example of this in American caselaw is Harper & Row v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Conclusion As always, we remind readers that these figures must be viewed with some caution. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 2:20 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
… Government needs to figure out how to make it a one-stop shop," the executive director of the group is quoted as saying. [read post]