Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 8,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
However such acts should be disciplinary offences, and may constitute the criminal offence of “breach of trust by a public officer”—Criminal Code s. 122; the constituent elements of the offence are defined in, R. v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 7:48 am
If a liberal legal academic cannot say publicly (if she believes it to be so) that Roe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
According to this approach, capitalism became a system in which people are defined by the need to make money to survive. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
Most people aren’t, even if they have heard of it. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:16 am
There are many strange things about the Internet and the manner in which it operates. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
Even actual “speakers” rarely get more than 8 minutes, unless they are very prominent people such as judges or senior government or WIPO people speaking on very important topics. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:58 pm
Here's an excerpt from the opinion, NRA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Consent-based privacy protections allow corporations to do as they please with people’s data as long as they’re able to extract superficial agreement. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
As the Council of Europe authors found, “[t]he most ‘successful’ of problematic content is that which plays on people’s emotions, encouraging feelings of superiority, anger or fear. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm
The government's explanation for this exemption is, in effect, that because such employers typically can and do prefer to hire employees who are coreligionists who can be assumed to share the churches' religious commitments, such employees are less likely to wish to purchase birth control: "[H]ouses of worship and their integrated auxiliaries that object to contraceptive coverage on religious grounds are more likely than other employers to employ people of the same faith… [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
In 1984 in Berkemer v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm
We owe it to the children, young people and families in our communities to address these issues before it’s too late. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:00 am
In a short policy brief drawing from the experience of the right to counsel in the criminal context, Laura K. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 12:50 pm
" Dow Agrosciences L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:53 am
Dockless Bikes v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
A car is personal property by they way.Now if you are found illegally possessing body armour (i.e. when demanded to "show your papers" you come up short), then the horrible teeth of the Act come out...the body armour can be seized!! [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court in Maryland v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:17 am
It's far short. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
Still, I have found there to be a tremendous level of people and resources eager to support me as I grow as a solo attorney. [read post]
