Search for: "R v. E"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 15,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 6:45 am
Os GTs de áudio, vídeo, texto e imagem, e direito autoral, cada um com um responsável e conectados diretamente com a organização do simpósio, têm a tarefa de colher documentos e experiências em âmbito nacional e internacional, além de estimular a participação necessária para que a discussão e elaboração das políticas… [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:00 am
Décision Malgré le caractère incomplet de l’analyse effectuée par le juge de première instance, la Cour, après le réexamen de la preuve intrinsèque et extrinsèque ainsi que des effets juridiques et pratiques de l’article 260.35 de la Loi sur la protection du consommateur, conclut que le juge n’a pas commis d’erreur en déterminant le caractère véritable de cette… [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:07 am
Eugene R. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 3:44 am
Lapsley v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:28 pm
In McGuire v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Taylor Law considerations concerning General Municipal Law Section 207-a/207-cBarnes v Council 82, [David Monroe], Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 719Watertown v Watertown PBA, Court of Appeals, 95 NY2d 73Local 2562, IAFF, AFL-CIO, v Cohoes, Court of Appeals, 94 NY2d 686The Court of Appeals has handed down three rulings concerning issues involving collective bargaining under the Taylor Law as they relate to negotiating procedures to implement and administer General Municipal Law… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:46 pm
Review Granted People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:54 pm
Alameda County Employees’ Retirement Association, and Hipsher v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
Last week, in Minneci v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:21 am
Cette disposition a été censurée par le Conseil constitutionnel. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
See In re G R Lane Health Products Limited, Serial No. 85115445 (July 10, 2013) [not precedential]. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:38 am
11) De descubrirse indicios de otros hechos delictivos, se comunicará el descubrimiento al Juez competente, para que éste disponga la pertinencia o no de su utilización en la investigación en curso (en vía de ampliación) o para que el Ministerio Público evalúe si hay mérito para iniciar investigación penal sobre el tema descubierto. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
§ 102(a) or § 102(e). [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 5:30 am
Jean R. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Professor Jean R. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 5:06 am
Kim, and Sabastian V. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard) Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 3:46 pm
Ruiz v. [read post]