Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 14,271
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2012, 11:01 pm
Texas in 2003); and we have anti-miscegenation laws, struck down when 16 states still had them (Loving v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
In her 2015 opinion in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:33 pm
Justice Kennedy with opinion in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:26 am
The eagerly awaited oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:29 pm
From Dfinity Found. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
Therefore, with high degrees of obligation, precision, and delegation, the Rome Statute created a strong prohibition regime against rape in war. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
If you needed any further proof that the Justices are just trolling us, you need look no further than United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
In the case of K.U. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:37 am
When Andrew Fleischman finished writing his Fault Lines post about the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
The case of Smith v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
., v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
It is also part of the reason, I think, for his strong and elegant support for strict separation of church and state in opposition to a triumphalist version of Christianity. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm
Hamilton International Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 11:50 am
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In a class action lawsuit alleging that Tinder discriminated on the basis of age in violation of California state laws by charging consumers age 30 and over a higher price for Tinder Plus subscriptions, the California Court of Appeal recently reversed the trial court’s judgment in favor of Tinder, holding there was no strong public policy that justified the allegedly discriminatory pricing model. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Waradzin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:07 am
In his concurrence in Bond v. [read post]
Centaurs, Jean Valjean, and a proposed three-sentence ruling on the meaning of favorable termination
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm
United States as amicus curiae Jonathan Ellis, assistant to the solicitor general, argued for the United States in support of Thompson. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:13 pm
In support of its argument they cited the Court's decision in 1518628 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
