Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit"
Results 7521 - 7540
of 10,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm
Importantly, at least one federal district court in the State of Texas agrees with this position. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:10 pm
Federal: The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reinstates a hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliation lawsuit against General Motors, noting that economic harm is not required for an employment decision to be actionable under Title VII. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.Docket: 10-778Issue(s): Whether the court of appeals correctly affirmed the lower court’s dismissal at the pleading stage, based on the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for the petitioners' unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the United States Brief in… [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, based in Houston. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:33 pm
And it might be relevant in Palin, if Palin loses at the Second Circuit (which will apply the "actual malice" test as a matter of First Amendment law in any event, relying on N.Y. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 4:54 am
All note that Justice Sotomayor sat on a similar case before the Second Circuit that concluded only that the Supreme Court alone could decide that issue. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 8:10 am
Circuit’s analysis of the second Boumediene factor and thus does not trigger entitlement to habeas review: Petitioners mischaracterize the United States’ detention policy both at Guantanamo Bay and Bagram as one of attempting to evade judicial review, based on the military’s apparent decision not to transfer individuals captured during the armed conflict to the United States or later to Guantanamo Bay, where habeas attaches. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Suppose further that the Court in Riegel affirms PMA device preemption with respect to all the claims that the Second Circuit held were preempted (that's a lot of claims). [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 6:25 am
First, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s revised decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 12:05 pm
Contact us for a copy of “A Desktop Guide To Federal Tort Claims Within the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit,” or to learn more about claims against the federal government for negligence, malpractice and wrongful death. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:05 pm
Contact us for a copy of "A Desktop Guide To Federal Tort Claims Within the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit," or to learn more about claims against the federal government for negligence, malpractice and wrongful death. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
In any event, we can look forward to years of litigation and circuit splits trying to sort out what the Court hath wrought. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
Thus, in this latter group, the Court isn’t considering the same materials a second time; it’s considering an expanded group of materials for the first time. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 10:31 pm
Waxman, a former United States solicitor general. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am
Biden, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ruled that the U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
On Tuesday, the Court sat in Austin; on Wednesday, the Court had a special sitting in Amarillo.1 On Tuesday, the Court heard arguments about the oil & gas question certified from the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:01 am
Now, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has rejected her bid to lift that injunction in a key decision on appeal. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:28 am
And the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has just upheld that sanctions order. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 12:05 pm
The First Circuit Court of Appeals decision issued this week1 seems to open the door for policyholders to claim that their state statutory remedies are not impacted unless the choice of law provisions are crystal clear that they do, The court held: This maritime insurance case from Massachusetts arises on interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
