Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 7541 - 7560 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2017, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
That lifestyle is based upon sexual orientation and gender identity that the United States Supreme Court has recently recognized. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion, and the United States Supreme Court denied applications for certiorari from both sides. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am by Mark Patrick
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion, and the United States Supreme Court denied applications for certiorari from both sides. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm by Ad Law Defense
  So what did the plaintiffs use to satisfy their plausibility burden under Ashcroft v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:23 pm
For example, forum states may have a lower bar for registration requirements than foreign states; thus, out of state conduct that may be deemed relatively benign in the foreign state may prompt severe consequences once the migrant offender moves to the forum state. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
United States HUD (opinion here) in which Judge Kavanaugh asked the DC Circuit to rule that “all discriminatory transfers (and discriminatory denials of requested transfers) are actionable under Title VII. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm by Josh Blackman
The sweetest sentence came on the penultimate page: In determining that plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the merits of their Free Exercise claim, we also have no need to rely upon either South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court finds that the City's effort to address the negative secondary effects of adult establishments is not constitutionally objectionable under any of the standards set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Renton v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 10:18 am by bklemm@foley.com
The Ryan Foods case exemplifies the broader judicial resistance to regulatory overreach and highlights the ongoing legal and legislative battles that will shape the future of noncompete agreements in the United States. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:44 am by Eugene Volokh
  Section 425.16, subdivision (b)(1), states: “A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on… [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:38 am by Theodore Ruger
 In certain localities in the United States, parental objections to vaccination have resulted in a high proportion of children forgoing immunization. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 7:00 am by Jenny Gesley
Supreme Court held in Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]