Search for: "United States v. Lively" Results 7541 - 7560 of 11,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 3:00 am by Scott Bomboy
In March 1925, the anti-evolution group had its first big success when Tennessee Governor Austin Peay signed the first law in the United States to ban the teaching of evolution. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am by Scott Bomboy
The Colorado state supreme court didn’t accept Phillips’ appeal and his attorneys then petitioned the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:18 am by Terry Lenamon
And looking out over the expanse outside these windows, I think about where I sit and where I live - in Florida, in the United States, and I'm humbled. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-10591, involves a clash of titans like we haven’t seen since 1974’s Rumble in the Jungle:   It seems that Judges Posner and Wilkinson disagree on the interpretation of “sexual activity” in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For the proposition that regulations that would have been valid in 1791 are valid today, Justice Thomas cites one case, the 2010 ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:30 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
A total hip replacement is the most common elective surgical procedure in the United States with over 600,000 artificial hips implanted in patients in any given year. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:48 am by Adam Schlossman
   Most of my arguments have been in courts of appeals, only a handful in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:53 pm by Jack Pringle
 POA Authority and the "Clear Statement Rule"Timely ReferenceOnce again, and as described in Arredondo, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has stepped in to tell state courts how the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) mandates that these courts construe instruments. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:43 am by Ronald Mann
  The circumstance was most apparent because the argument followed immediately upon United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:24 am by Danielle D'Onfro
Colleen Roh Sinzdak argued for the United States as a “friend of the court” in support of the city. [read post]