Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
See Sterling v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:16 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
A recent decision from the California Court of Appeal, Bode v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
United States Issue: Does United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States US General Open source,… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States US General Open source,… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Each will generally infringe and the right holder can elect whom to sue. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:05 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
The main case at the Court is Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:50 am
Miller v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Each will decide what status to accord former detainees: refugee, asylum seeker, long-term visa holder, etc. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:35 am
The case is TransCore, LP v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
One such case is Swedenburg v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:09 am
Last week, in Kamienski v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 1:39 am
BiesCRIMINAL PRACTICE- Double Jeopardy - Insanity - Sentencing"The Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar a state court from conducting a full hearing on mental capacity under Atkins v. [read post]
