Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 7561 - 7580
of 10,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2017, 12:10 pm
The United States Supreme Court has created a “policymaker exception” to First Amendment protection, recognizing that an elected official must be able to appoint some high-level politically loyal individuals who will help him or her implement the goals or programs for which the public voted. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:10 pm
The United States Supreme Court has created a “policymaker exception” to First Amendment protection, recognizing that an elected official must be able to appoint some high-level politically loyal individuals who will help him or her implement the goals or programs for which the public voted. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm
John Thune, South Dakota Republican, that the Uighurs were “hardened killers bent on the destruction of the United States,” the brief said that was an absurd statement, given the fact that four Uighurs who had been released and are now living in Bermuda were “now raking sand traps for American golfers in Bermuda, a few hours from Washington. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
Washington, 466 U. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
For instance, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 9 of the Texas Constitution both protect against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:50 am
Bush v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) US CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington… [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
Washington, and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:35 pm
As stated by Judge Learned Hand in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:10 am
§ 2305.04 (LexisNexis 2006); Washington – 7 years, Wash. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 6:21 am
This decision applies only to those employees who work for private companies in the United States and have a right to organize a union. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:35 am
” At the Biden Forum, Seema Nanda weighs in on Janus v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
As the California Supreme Court stated in Cobbs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
United States was the only case in which the Court granted review in a new round of orders. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:44 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
17 May 2018, 3:15 am
In legal and constitutional terms, Meghan Markle is a natural-born United States citizen. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
In the United States, multiple federal bodies develop and enforce e-commerce counterfeit goods regulations. [read post]
