Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 741 - 760
of 6,279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:38 am
Weigand v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:00 am
Weigand v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
In the 1990 case of Burnham v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 1:57 pm
Circuit heard oral argument in Doe v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Even if the Executive Branch ultimately wins in Zivitofksy v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:26 am
As the court wrote in its order, "Under defendants' theory, executive branch officials may treat FISA as optional and freely employ the SSP [state secrets privilege] to evade FISA, a statute enacted specifically to rein in and create a judicial check for executive branch abuses of surveillance authority. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:19 am
Dutra group v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm
In County of Hawaii v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:19 am
A motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) may be granted only if the documentary evidence submitted by the moving party "utterly refutes the factual allegations of the complaint and conclusively establishes a defense to the claims as a matter of law" (Kopelowitz & Co., Inc. v Mann, 83 AD3d 793, 796; Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 83). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
Thomas v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am
Moreover, waiving the privilege may be perceived to acknowledge that executive privilege has any application to Bannon at all, something Biden may be loathe to do. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:18 am
Supreme Court arguments in Winter v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:52 pm
The court cites Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 3:41 pm
The decision stems from a case where branch manager Don Delamont arranged the mass departure of virtually the entire branch staff, and as a result, a large volume of the branch's client base. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Mistretta v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 5:44 am
The plaintiffs’ claims regarding the consequences and damages flowing from the defendants’ alleged failure to request that a title company provide a title report by a certain date are conclusory and speculative (see May Dock Lane, LLC v Harras Bloom & Archer, LLP, 222 AD3d at 637; 126 Main St., LLC v Kriegsman, 218 AD3d 524, 525; Sierra Holdings, LLC v Phillips, Weiner, Quinn, Artura & Cox, 112 AD3d 909, 910). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:13 pm
Reiterman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:08 am
Washington, 187 F.3d 703, 711 (7th Cir.1999); Branch v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 1:44 pm
Bush and Munaf v. [read post]
