Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Beaches are open, England’s football team (did I say that? [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 5:16 am
And in the Flatow case, known as Flatow v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
State Bank, 77 U.S. 604, 651 (1870). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
” In Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
The courts should take into account agreements such as the MoU and should assume that they would be adhered to, following RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2009) UKHL. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 10:52 pm
The abstract states: In Ireland, abortion is illegal. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:13 am
However, the California Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:53 am
In The New England Journal of Medicine, Nicholas Bagley, David Jones, and Timothy Jost discuss the possible impact of a decision in favor of the challengers in King v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:35 am
It states: “ 4. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 3:30 am
Mary Ziegler In the aftermath of Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:06 am
Ladele v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
The Justice Department’s position will have no practical impact in New England other than the likelihood that matters will more likely be brought in state court under state laws when sexual orientation and gender identity are at issue. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
The Justice Department’s position will have no practical impact in New England other than the likelihood that matters will more likely be brought in state court under state laws when sexual orientation and gender identity are at issue. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
The question for the court was whether OA’s operations in England met the requirement of an “establishment” under Council Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 so that secondary insolvency proceedings could be opened in England. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down its long awaited judgment in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 7:33 pm
See Thompson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:54 pm
Romano v NY Presbyterian (2006)). [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]