Search for: "Free v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 39,677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2007, 1:25 am
LEXIS 62123 (ED WI, Aug. 22, 2007), a federal district court held that an inmate stated colorable free exercise and RLUIPA claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Public employees and the First Amendment right to free speechThomas v City of Blanchard, USCA 10th Circuit, No. 07-6197In considering a public employee's claim that his or her First Amendment right to free speech has been compromised by his or her public employer, courts distinguish between the employee's speech in terms of the vindication of a personal interest and the vindication of a public interest.Another arena in which an employee may contend that his or… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:35 am by Andrew Koppelman
If the plaintiff in Meriwether v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 10:55 am by Duets Guest Blogger
  The post Do EU principles of free movement trump trade mark rights or vice versa? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am by Jeff Gamso
  He alone believed (see United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.In Jackson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm by Howard Friedman
However the court refused to dismiss his Free Exercise claim for damages because it read recent 7th Circuit precedent as requiring the state to show that it was using the least restrictive means when prison rules impose a substantial burden on religious practice.In Wallace v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:20 am by sally
McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Case C-434/09); [2011] WLR (D) 153 “Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC was not applicable to a European Union citizen who had never exercised their right of free movement, who had always resided in a member state of which they were a national and who was also a national of another member state. [read post]