Search for: "Free v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 35,761
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2010, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
 The court held that double-celling plaintiff with a Muslim cell mate did not amount to state action in violation of 1st Amendment rights.In Johnson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 10:26 am by John Elwood
Then, on Monday morning, the court disposed of two long-running free-exercise-of-religion cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
Housing authority need not state the obvious that the offer is  final Omar v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:10 am
LEXIS 36615 (SD NY, May 18, 2007), a New York federal district court allowed an inmate in a work release program to move ahead with his Free Exercise and state law challenges to the refusal by authorities to grant him a pass to attend Pentecostal church services.In Stewart v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 8:29 am by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff was however allowed to proceed on his First Amendment and state law challenges to these practices and his RLUIPA challenge to the grooming policy.In Shaw v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:00 am by Howard Friedman
However it dismissed his Free Exercise and Equal Protection claims and his RLUIPA claim against one defendant.In LaRue v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am by Howard Friedman
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:05 am by Walter Olson
” [NYT via Caron] Pentagon Papers case, Meyer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:53 am by Marty Lederman
As Ruthann Robson explains in her analysis for this blog, in its decision in Lane v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:14 pm
Statistics on free v. commercial from the US Recent surveys show that most of the North American legal profession is using these free tools. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:45 am by Federal and Extradition Defense
  Practitioners who seek to assist in post conviction relief on the basis of Padilla v Kentucky must make sure of their state post conviction jurisprudence post-Padilla. [read post]