Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
(See ALS Scan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:48 am
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm
However, and unfortunately for Mr A-L, while Baroness Hale, and indeed others, would have remitted the case for trial, there had been supervening events. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
”); Hale v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision The Supreme Court, in a leading judgment from Lady Hale and Lord Toulson and a supplementary judgment from Lord Neuberger, discharged the injunction and reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
See Hale v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:23 am
In R (M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 Baroness Hale held that “care and attention” meant “looking after” someone and “looking after” meant doing something for the person being cared for which he cannot or should not be expected to do for himself.SL had attempted suicide in 2009 after he had become homeless. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:14 pm
Covenant Trust Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
Judgment was handed down today in the case of Ferdinand v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 2454 (QB)). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Handing down a unanimous judgment, Lord Thomas and Lady Hale concurring for narrower reasons, Lord Mance (with whom Lord Neuberger and Lord Hodge agreed) held that the Bill was outside the legislative competence of the Welsh Assembly under both section 198(4) and 108(5) of the Government of Wales Act 2006 and was incompatible with the ECHR, A1P1. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:54 pm
” Matthew Alexander Kim v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Apple Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
Hale v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal (5-2; Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale giving strong dissenting judgments). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
Lord Hodge (on behalf of Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) delivered the majority view, with only Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:48 am
The appeal was heard and will be considered by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 3:07 am
Lord Hope and Lady Hale give the judgment of the Court. [read post]
