Search for: "Harvey v. Harvey"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
01/13/10 Christian Science MonitorGerry Shih, Same-Sex Marriage Case, Day 3: The Defense Pushes Back, 01/13/10 NY Times "The Bay Area"Liveblogging Perry v Schwarzenegger – Day 3, Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4, 01/13/10 FireDogLake NewsBob Egelko, Trial topic: Is anti-gay bias still a problem? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:17 am
Justice Harvey agreed with the Plaintiff and dismissed the application for a further discovery. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:10 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:25 am
Peter Chilton v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:35 am
His application (Callahan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 9:13 am
See, e.g., Al-Bandar v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 6:39 am
Florida and Graham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:04 am
The court cited LinkAmerica Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
The Intellectual Property Institute (IPI) is pleased to announce that Alison Brimelow CBE, former President of the European Patent Office (EPO), takes over from Ian Harvey as the new Chair of the IPI Board. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:41 am
Bayne v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:58 am
V. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
” [via Lexisone] Harold Lee Harvey v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:04 am
From Vengalattore v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:10 am
Harvey, 2007 U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ, and Aston… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ, and Aston… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
In Hills v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm
We will add the correct date when it is known][Update 2: This judgment will be handed down on Monday 6 October 2014 at 10.30am in Court 13] The following libel trials are listed to take place this term Craggs v Harvey. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm
A pending petition in Harvey v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 3:41 pm
Here's a new outrageous one, MacLennan v. [read post]
