Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 741 - 760
of 13,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 8:23 pm
Since the rejection was under § 102(f), the issue in this case was whether the named inventors were the true inventors, i.e. who invented. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:46 am
As a result, despite routine checks, it did not come to light that the deadline formalities had only been accomplished in part, i.e. by only paying the appeal fee but not filing a notice of appeal.IV. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:46 am
As a result, despite routine checks, it did not come to light that the deadline formalities had only been accomplished in part, i.e. by only paying the appeal fee but not filing a notice of appeal.IV. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:56 pm
See In re Bush, 346 B.R. 207. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:27 pm
See In re Ruskin, 347 F.2d 843, 846 (CCPA 1965). [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
As Business Insider reported, the Obama administration delayed processing refugees as it expanded screening measures; refugees already in the country were re-screened. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 1:10 am
”); In re Freeman, 30 F.3d 1459, 1464 (Fed. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 7:35 am
Attorneys representing employees often seek production of documents in “native format”—i.e. the electronic format in which the document was created. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:11 am
You’re not sending out bills and you’re not getting paid, but you still should keep time records. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:11 am
" Let me get this straight; many Muslim leaders have told the world on countless occasions that Islam is at war with America i.e., the "Great Satan"; jihadist groups are funded by Muslim nations; for two decades male Muslims of Middle Eastern descent have been exploding bombs or engaged in suicide missions murdering thousands of innocent people in America and Western Europe but, you're a bigot if you get nervous when you see fellow air passengers who are… [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Which CKE (i.e., Carl's Jr.) discovered on appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm
A judgment based on justiciability concerns – i.e., mootness or ripeness – is not a judgment on the merits. [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:27 pm
Hope you're being punk'd? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
One of the conditions is that the request of re-establishment of rights is filed within two months of the removal of the cause of non-compliance (R 136(1)).[2] According to the established case law the cause of non-compliance is removed on the day on which the competent person (i.e. the applicant or the professional representative) becomes aware or should have become aware that the time limit had been missed. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:04 am
Aug. 1, 2017) (quoting In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1534 (Fed. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 3:06 am
" In re N.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:33 am
In re Eagle Crest Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); see also In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 129 USPQ2d 1148, 1149-50 (TTAB 2019). [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
On first glance at that photo, I thought she was holding a dagger.What we're hearing is that Linda Greenhouse wanted to be as free as possible to criticize the Supreme Court's recent turn to the right -- without having to worry about such pesky things as, you know, "impartiality"....And criticize Greenhouse did, after she had the cameras killed. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:23 pm
A suit can also take the angst out of deciding what to wear in the morning, and suit separates can be re-mixed with other items in your wardrobe. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 12:30 am
Under Rule 134(2) EPC, if the contracting state is one in which the EPO is located (i.e. [read post]
