Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 157,423
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2022, 1:06 pm
The post FRANCES BRIDDELL v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:34 am
Read the opinion The post KYE-REE KENNETH MARTIN YOUNG v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:23 am
HARRIS v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:01 am
R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:12 pm
It is forthcoming in the Florida State University Law Review 36 (2009). [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:27 am
United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:58 am
Will and to State v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
Thanks SCOTUSBlog for putting up the link to the oral argument transcript in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
CRS – United States Supreme Court: Criminal Law Cases in the October 2015 Term. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
In my view, such a law runs afoul of New York v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:09 am
Regina (Al-Skeini and Other) v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Migrants' marriage rule bias is disproportionate Regina (Baiai and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The statutory scheme requiring permission by the Home Office for marriage by people subject to immigration control or those who had entered the UK illegally contravened articles 12 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing the right to marry and prohibiting discrimination for nationality or religion. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:58 am
Regina (Davies) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Queen’s Bench Division “There was a need to introduce a requirement that claimants who wished to make a challenge under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 should have to obtain the court's permission to do so. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:10 am
Regina (AM)(Somalia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An asylum-seeker's in-country appeal against removal on human rights grounds could not be stifled by the later issue of a certificate by the Secretary of State for the Home Department that the opposition was clearly unfounded. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:48 am
United States or so I argue in Verfassungsblog.For a whiff of the argument, For half a century, conservatives complained to anyone who would listen that the Supreme Court’s decision protecting abortion rights in Roe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 4:50 am
On March 1, Petitioner United States filed its merits brief in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:20 am
Annamaria V. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:32 am
On November 13, 2012 the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
IRS and the Future of Tax Administrative Law (Part II), by Daniel Hemel (Chicago): In Bullock v. [read post]
