Search for: "McCarthy v. McCarthy"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,076
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 10:32 am
Originally, Title V raised the 500-shareholder threshold to 1000. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Starting in 2002 and continuing for about a decade, 1-800 Contacts systematically locked up many of its online contact lenses retail competitors into settlement agreements that prohibited the parties from bidding on each other’s trademarks at the search engines. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
See, e.g., McCarthy v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
Lago v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 6:05 am
In 1998, he began providing services to James McCarthy and two of [his] businesses, American Boiler and Industrial Property Management (`IPM’). [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am
Other news update: For weekly readers, the AmeriKat wrote about the biggest US news of the week on Thursday in the Viacom and Premier League v Google/Youtube litigation here, which saw Judge Stanton award summary judgment in favor of Google. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 2:36 pm
McCarthy (1986) 176 Cal.App.3d 288, 299.) [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
But since I do think that its progressive interlocutors shift freely between hypocrisy and fanaticism, I am as troubled by Andy McCarthy as to the consequences down the road. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 12:00 pm
In NAACP v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
McGinity v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling against President Trump’s travel ban in IRAP v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:48 am
Interlink Products Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm
This "gamers' lawsuit" against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard (DeMartini et al v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 1:25 pm
Davis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
The four-part test for determining inherent distinctiveness of trade dress was set forth in Seabrook v. [read post]
