Search for: "People v. Green" Results 741 - 760 of 2,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 6:26 am by Matt Brown
The prosecutor pulled out two classic arguments in a brief period of time, and they pretty much sum up the mindset of the worst people I encounter on the other side of the “V. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm by INFORRM
Scotland Scottish Green Party MSP Andy Wightman has been sued for defamation with £750,000 damages sought, and has stated on his blog that he will fight the case “to the utmost. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
Michigan News <> Attorney General v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:30 am
The program takes place in a studio (and in location: street, shopping mall or unexpected at people's homes). [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
  This included evidence from Matt Sprake, of the News Pic agency, who told of carrying out surveillance on more than 300 people over two years, almost always involving covert photography. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am by Eric Penzer
  A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
A QAnon follower named Marjorie Taylor Green won her Republican primary and may soon enter the House of Representatives. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Williams, 362 N.C. 628, 669 S.E.2d 290, 294 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2008) (quoting In re Appeal of The Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
After a thirty-five-year career as a letter carrier, the petitioner in Green v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 9:43 am by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
Inadmissibility Series I: INA 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Prostitution Inadmissibility Series INA 212– Part V 212(a)(2)(D)(i) Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 lists a series of classes of foreign nationals who are inadmissible to the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit 1978) (government arranged for `mail cover,’ under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Perhaps, but only because people like SA are inclined to use their religion to satisfy their will to power.Freedom to Impose ReligionAlthough Judaism and some other non-Christian faiths regard a fetus as less than a baby, in his opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
People v Porter, 2007 NY Slip Op 918, 2007 N.Y. [read post]