Search for: "Phillips v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 1,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Graeme Hall
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011): The European Court of Human Rights has rejected Abu Hamza’s claim that his trial in the United Kingdom for soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges was unfair. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:01 pm
MunchkinPAC-MAN was originally developed and sold by Namco, but Atari and Midway owned the exclusive rights within the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 11:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Since the Constitution was adopted, the United States has always had two levels of government — a national government that handles things which affect the states collectively, and state governments that look after matters within their borders. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:53 am by Dennis Crouch
Together we represent thousands of organizations that employ millions of workers in the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am by Ben
In August 2016, she placed the photograph—which has a pending copyright registration in the United States—on her Instagram page, accompanied by a copyright notice. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Indeed, it is a bit difficult to explain why, exactly, password guessing leads to unauthorized access — the Fifth Circuit was forced to explain that seemingly obvious conclusion in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
The United States had one amicus brief this term with a composite score of over 90. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by centerforartlaw
Phillip Barcio, Why Was Richard Serra’s Tilted Arc So Controversial? [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
On the Constitution Unit Blog, Brian Walker assesses the dropped Contempt proceedings against former Northern Ireland secretary Peter Hain. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
JUSTICE SCALIA: That is conferring upon the ICJ the responsibility to decide the meaning of a United States treaty which is United States law. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm by Rick
  (Phillips, supra, at 6, citing Niko v. [read post]