Search for: "Shields v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 5,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
Tanner v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
Thornton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:36 am
Bloomberg LP published an article that was based on the contents of a letter of request for legal assistance that the UKLEB had sent to the foreign state. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 5:09 am
The Court held that Trump's speech and acts, viewed in their totality, were unofficial and thus fell outside the shield of Nixon.I am unsure if this rationale will stand up on appeal, as Nixon was pretty emphatic in stating that official presidential immunity should be construed broadly. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:23 pm
United States – the security acts, though discretionary, were not grounded in social, economic, or political policy of a nature and quality that Congress intended to shield. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
The Supreme Court rejected Nixon’s challenge in Nixon v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Beginning even before the Supreme Court’s 1966 ruling in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:37 am
In other words, the law was not about fetal health, safety, or termination — and certainly not about protecting women’s health — but ultimately sought “to chip away at the private choice shielded by Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 5:19 am
The appellate court, however, seized upon the rationale behind Graham v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:20 pm
In Bernstein v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 9:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
But if a defendant says "I want the jury to see your whole face; here's a transparent mask, wear that one," is there really a state interest in saying "Nope, the witness is free to obscure half of his face while testifying (and do so behind a plexiglass shield, even) despite the fact there's not really a state interest in making sure the mask isn't transparent? [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:09 pm
Additional EU Member States: As was the takeaway from the Schrems II decision, any data transfer outside of the EEA should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:53 am
In Ewing v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Under Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Casey and Roe v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:29 am
In Orr v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:45 am
” “The Court further finds that the part of plaintiff’s motion seeking to dismiss defendants’ first counterclaim (and sixth defense) alleging legal malpractice, as being time-barred by the three-year statute of limitations (see CPLR 214[6]; Stewart v Berger, 137 AD3d 1103 [2nd Dept 2016]), is granted, except to the extent that the first counterclaim seeks to offset as a shield for equitable recoupment purposes, a sum equal to an award of legal… [read post]
