Search for: "State v. K. P."
Results 741 - 760
of 1,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm
The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $2,500. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
Karasik As we recently blogged here, EEOC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 8:09 pm
V., Margolis, H. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:29 am
P. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:19 am
ShareAs securities cases go, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:00 pm
Karasik EEOC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Amelio 141,167 127,500 765 4,884 274,316 Reuben V. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 5:33 pm
For example, Harding observes critically a tradition where important concepts in science, such as objectivity v. subjectivity, reason v. emotion, and mind v. body, were considered to have a gendered quality; with the former being masculine and the latter being feminine.[10] Similarly, I ask critically here if the distinction I’ve drawn between “tools” and “cyberspace” is susceptible to the same assumptions. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Bull, research director of the Administrative Conference of the United States; Colleen V. [read post]
27 Nov 2020, 6:50 am
The practical difference between a 401(k) and a 403(b) is that a 401(k) will often offer an employer match for any money deposited into the 401(k) plan while a 403(b) rarely does that. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
Yesterday in Erica P. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:19 am
Jay Kirkpatrick Exhibit V Declaration and Curriculum Vitae of Dr. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Tаxрауеrѕ whо ignore or refuse tо рау a Nоtісе аnd Demand for Pауmеnt from the IRS wіll rесеіvе what is rеfеrrеd to аѕ a “Fіnаl Nоtісе оf Intеnt tо Lеvу аnd Nоtісе of Yоur Right to A… [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
- k [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:17 am
At least one California state court said no – Simpson v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
The Appellate Division observed that New York State law recognizes that “[p]ersons involved in certain family court proceedings have a constitutional right to counsel in such proceedings” (Family Ct Act § 261). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:58 am
Seven Palm Investments, LLC, Peter P. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
7 (2010) (Reines.2010) Gregory P. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
(d) Frequency Limitation- Section 1862(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)) is amended--(1) in paragraph (1)--(A) in subparagraph (N), by striking `and' at the end;(B) in subparagraph (O) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting `, and'; and(C) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:`(P) in the case of voluntary advance care planning consultations (as defined in paragraph (1) of section 1861(hhh)), which are performed more frequently than is covered under… [read post]
